• Me and Archit visited the Living Lightly exhibition at Indira Gandhi National Center for the Arts, at Mallathahalli. I had noticed much of the language contained an overt praise of the pastoralist lifestyle and the belief that such lives would have been / are inherently more sustainable. In similar arguments, I wonder if the scale of humanity now is taken into account. Or the is the suggestion that these lifestyles would not have produced or allowed humanity to grow into this monstrous size. Meaning if colonisation and industrialisation had not happend then these lifestyles would have then been sustainable?

  • Archit described the exhibits as animals with no agency, where do we even see animals with any agency in urban spaces? Except street dogs and birds?